“But if you forget to reblog Madame Zeroni, you and your family will be cursed for always and eternity.”
NOT RISKING IT
pros of dating me
- you can hold my hand whenever you want
- you can cuddle with me whenever you want
- you can kiss me whenever you want
cons of dating me
- i get jealous easily
- i’m sad a lot
- i will never feel good enough for you no matter how many times you tell me i am
sounds like a good time (to clarify I mean no sarcasm)
Ok, real talk though: while we’re all talking about Hoenn remakes
You know what OTHER game needs a remake for the 3DS?
Final Fantasy Crystal Chronicles.
And the first one, not the other one for the Wii.
Find other caravans via spot pass and get a random item from them, join up to fight…
I think the entire fandom agrees that this needs to be a thing.
Let’s play the biggest game of kick the can on the internet.
To kick the can, reblog it. I wanna see how long this can go on for.
my girlfriend just started a wind waker file
and she named the hero guuurl
i am dead
I suddenly remembered the existence of the greatest commercial ever made and wanted to make 100% sure that you have also all seen it.
It is truly life changing.
Never forget how awful IGN are
Wonderful 101 is good you piece of shit
GEE YOU THINK? YOU THINK I HAVE WONDER PINK AT THE TOP OF MY BLOG FOR NO REASON? IT’S COMPARING IT TO GONE HOME BECAUSE THEY RATED IT HIGHER.
ok this image really really annoys me every time I see it and you’ve managed to make it worse! so here goes, I guess; I’m sorry if I come across as condescending or something but I’m really sick of seeing this shit
So to start, I’ll admit that Imagine: Party Babyz likely does not deserve that high a score (obviously)! And to be clear, nothing I am about to write is saying that you should trust IGN above all other game sites or something; I mean, I don’t even read them myself…
That being said, the God Hand review was written by an entirely different person than the Imagine: Party Babyz one, and was also published over two years earlier. Furthermore, the two games aren’t in the same genre, don’t have the same target audience, etc. They aren’t directly comparable! And even if they were, it’s foolish to assume that the review scores wouldn’t be influenced at all by the differing writers and the time span (though, yes, that really shouldn’t account for a difference of that size, it’s worth noting as reviews are subjective). Again, not saying Babyz deserved that score at all, but… what does God Hand have anything to do with that? I mean, even if the point is as simple as “IGN SCREWED UP TWICE!!”, it’s my understanding that neither of those reviewers are with IGN at the moment (rather, one of them isn’t and the other was a freelancer?) so I’m not sure how an opinion of IGN’s current reviews can be based on that.
Now as far as the additional image goes, which are actual current reviews… what exactly is your point? Gone Home’s an excellent game. I’m sure Wonderful 101 is pretty good too. But two entirely different people reviewed them, and the one who reviewed Gone Home gave it a better score. What exactly is the problem with that? Do you have an actual point beyond just being annoyed that someone didn’t like a game as much as you did…? That’s not even a bad score. And, really, I’m not exactly sure why you think IGN is an outlier here, since these scores are pretty consistent with what other reviewers gave both games!
Personally, I’m also really confused by you throwing the Dual Destinies review (which, I should note, was written by yet again a different person) in there, considering it probably deserves that score! I enjoyed it, don’t get me wrong, but its writing wasn’t as good as past games in the series by far, among other issues. And again, regardless of how our (and the reviewer’s) opinions apparently differ on the game, that’s not even a bad score! Now, if you were trying to make a point of how “rigidly linear” and “little gameplay” aren’t exactly good criticisms (unless the latter refers to them cutting the investigation phases down, in which case it makes sense), then yeah, that’s pretty dumb of the reviewer! But instead you’re focusing on the scores for… why, exactly?
The point of all this, really, is that I’m sick of these images being thrown around as if it’s some totally valid point about GAMES JOURNALISM BEING TERRIBLE!!! when there’s actual shit in that field that needs to be called out. Who fucking cares what someone at IGN gave a game 7 years ago? That should be the least of your concerns.
I’m sorry but you’re very wrong in your observations, IGN rates based off of being paid, if a game dev pays them well they review well if they don’t or don’t pay them at all that’s the most honest review you’ll get from them and even then it’s not objective because their butthurt that they didn’t get money. so it doesn’t matter who did the reviewing. (also gone home is amazing? come on)
gonna post some Miiverse stuff :D
This is very important
What do you call these?
whatever they want to be called
Passion Pit - Sleepyhead (Neo Tokyo Remix)